Why not to add REST secure sharing? Making it more secure than Signal

The secure Post Quantum vault for WordPress. Secure file/s sharing
User avatar
ale
User w
User w
Posts: 19
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2018 9:43 pm

Why not to add REST secure sharing? Making it more secure than Signal

Post by ale »

The code generated by the tool is loaded directly by WP. But we could not trust the admin, the site, or the server, so why doesn't the standalone BPQ (w3myPQ standalone HTML file) send the ciphered file to a specified host where w3myPQ is installed (and that will share the file). In this scenario, the BPQ (w3myPQ) JS code would not be generated by the server.
We will verify author permissions using the profile's ML-DSA-87 public key.

Coming soon...
User avatar
axew3
w3all User
w3all User
Posts: 3080
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 5:15 pm
Location: Italy
Contact:

Re: Why not to add REST secure sharing? Making it more secure than Signal

Post by axew3 »

Move Over Signal: Next w3myPQ and BPQ Are Challenging the Privacy Crown:
https://www.axew3.com/w3/2026/09/move-o ... acy-crown/
User avatar
axew3
w3all User
w3all User
Posts: 3080
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 5:15 pm
Location: Italy
Contact:

Re: Why not to add REST secure sharing? Making it more secure than Signal

Post by axew3 »

I am quite proud 😊 to announce that the w3myPQ 3.1.4 plugin and BPQ (aka BennyPQ) standalone file 3.2.0 are coming soon to let you see something that you may never have seen.

🔮 Experience the Present and the Future of Security
The most read about post-quantum migration in whitepapers. And about secrets communications.
With w3myPQ 3.1.4 and BPQ, you can actually run it, verify it, and visualize it directly.

It will be completely decentralized: a user sharing a payload via email tied to their key can use that same email to share the exact same payload across different WordPress sites, as long as those sites have the matching ML-DSA public key loaded (and use w3myPQ!)

Stay tuned lovely and cool people. It will be decentralized and cool!
Post Reply